tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4126985520350746834.post3230640350182102072..comments2024-03-28T07:00:21.554+00:00Comments on Chris O'Brien: My Ignite wish list – what got delivered and what didn’t?Chris O'Brienhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10022906552670607366noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4126985520350746834.post-38766395085746809762017-10-09T22:12:49.443+01:002017-10-09T22:12:49.443+01:00@Marco,
Actually I think you're right - it se...@Marco,<br /><br />Actually I think you're right - it seems *some* things only get generated when the site is first accessed (e.g. the auto-generated site icon, and perhaps the theme), but the site itself does indeed seem to get created at the same time as Group creation. I'm not sure if that's always been the case, but that's what some testing shows today.<br /><br />So, if that web hook on Group creation starts working properly, that would sort that one!<br /><br />Thanks for posting,<br /><br />COB.Chris O'Brienhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10022906552670607366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4126985520350746834.post-63340864347573083472017-10-07T16:34:31.942+01:002017-10-07T16:34:31.942+01:00Hi Chris,
my understanding is that as soon a /gro...Hi Chris,<br /><br />my understanding is that as soon a /group is created all items (AAD, EXO, SPO, Planner) will be inplace. I'm not talking about a directory object. The /group is always the combination of at least the core assets (AAD, SPO, EXO). Maybe that's the problem why the create operation is still missing but documented... its only in the beta version of MS Graph.<br /><br />Regarding in time of the site collection creation I'm pretty sure this is not waiting for anyone to access the site. I'm sure AAD ist first ;) but after the AAD object I'm sure Exchange and SharePoint kick in right after. There are many reasons this must be the case or otherwise the complete structure will start to fall apart.Marco Scheelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16022116810970181268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4126985520350746834.post-45066728356353088792017-10-07T11:25:26.356+01:002017-10-07T11:25:26.356+01:00@Jeremy,
Wow, interesting. That session is on my ...@Jeremy,<br /><br />Wow, interesting. That session is on my list to catch-up on - thanks for the pointer. I'm *still* surprised profile page extensibility has dropped off the list - not good. Maybe try and press the guys when you speak to them!<br /><br />Cheers,<br /><br />COB.Chris O'Brienhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10022906552670607366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4126985520350746834.post-10297615483442805492017-10-07T11:20:16.600+01:002017-10-07T11:20:16.600+01:00@Marco,
Thanks, interesting stuff. But y'know...@Marco,<br /><br />Thanks, interesting stuff. But y'know, isn't there a difference between a webhook on Group creation, and one for *when the SharePoint site gets created*. As far as I understand (unless something has changed recently), the SP site actually only gets created the first time it is accessed by an end-user (i.e. the link is clicked). That could be a long time after the Group gets created. <br /><br />So maybe we need a webhook for both things. I guess it's the SharePoint site one I'm most interested in though, since it's about applying a template to the site. Vesa mentioned on a call this week about the engineering challenges, which is why I think this is a separate thing to the webhook you reference in your Github issue and the documentation (which is purely about Group creation). <br /><br />Fingers crossed for both cases I guess! Thanks for the comment..<br /><br />Cheers,<br /><br />COB.Chris O'Brienhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10022906552670607366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4126985520350746834.post-18181765120652018522017-10-06T23:48:05.542+01:002017-10-06T23:48:05.542+01:00Great write up, as usual mate.
On the profile pag...Great write up, as usual mate.<br /><br />On the profile page extensibility. It was very clear from a few sessions including the LinkedIn one by Cey Ayken, that this is not on their immediate radar. The video for this is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTT9IKw2i3w&feature=youtu.be&t=44m05s that covers the extensibility question. I'm getting these guys on the Hyperfish Podcast to ask more in coming weeks too.<br />Jeremy Thakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14264476485361437612noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4126985520350746834.post-46055337809093310832017-10-06T19:42:52.661+01:002017-10-06T19:42:52.661+01:00Hi Chris,
technically the webhook for group creat...Hi Chris,<br /><br />technically the webhook for group creation should be "available". I'm als interested and I'm a big fan of the Microsoft Graph. Through the beta endpoint you should be able to get an call for every new Group. I've posted my issue here:<br />https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Microsoft-Graph/Webhook-aka-Subscription-for-groups-ressource-changeType-created/m-p/106356#M32<br /><br />I can get a working webhook for update or delete but the needed create is not working at least back in mid September. I don't have a contact to the MS Graph team, but maybe you as an MVP has some better reach ;) Marco Scheelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16022116810970181268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4126985520350746834.post-69562455266788743462017-10-06T17:45:26.560+01:002017-10-06T17:45:26.560+01:00@Paul,
Yes, and yes! Good point, I think the ALM ...@Paul,<br /><br />Yes, and yes! Good point, I think the ALM APIs for pushing out SPFx web parts and extensions are an omission here, so thanks. But yes - now that it's possible to do tenant-scoped deployments and control with the associated Custom Action/ClientSideComponentId, I do feel that a good chunk of the need can be dealt with now. After all, it can now be a matter of which sites you add the Custom Action to. <br /><br />But yes, I agree they're still needed. Thanks for the nudge :)<br /><br />Cheers,<br /><br />COB.Chris O'Brienhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10022906552670607366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4126985520350746834.post-27859349603510734002017-10-06T16:12:17.382+01:002017-10-06T16:12:17.382+01:00Hi Chris,
Perhaps the SPFx ALM APIs may also be ...Hi Chris, <br /><br />Perhaps the SPFx ALM APIs may also be relevant in your timeline? Are you less bothered about this since tenant-scoped SPFx became available?<br /><br />Cheers, <br />PaulAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18050397743317881258noreply@blogger.com